44. Management of financial risks

METRO Treasury manages the financial risks of the group. These primarily concern

• price risks,
• liquidity risks,
• credit risks,
• cash flow risks.

• For more information about the risk management system, see chapter – 3 economic report – 3.2 asset, financial and earnings position – financial and asset position – financial management in the combined management report.

Price risks

For METRO, price risks result from the impact of changes in market interest rates and/or foreign currency exchange rates on the value of financial instruments.

Interest rate risks can arise for METRO from changes in interest rate levels. If necessary, interest rate derivatives are used to cap these risks.

The remaining interest rate risk is assessed in accordance with IFRS 7 using a sensitivity analysis. In the process, the following assumptions are applied in the consideration of changes in interest rates:

• The total impact determined by the sensitivity analysis relates to the actual balance as of the closing date and reflects the impact for 1 year.
• Primary floating-rate financial instruments whose interest payments are not designated as the underlying transaction in a cash flow hedge against changes in interest rates are recognised in the interest result in the sensitivity analysis. The sensitivity is determined for a change of 10 basis points.
• Primary fixed-interest financial instruments are generally not recognised in the interest result that is attributable to changes in the interest rate level. In this regard, the variable interest flows within the group that result from a fair value hedge are recognised in the interest result. In this case, however, the interest-related change in the value of the underlying transaction is offset by the change in the value of the hedging transaction upon full effectiveness of the hedging transaction. The variable interest flows within the group that result from a fair value hedge are recognised in the interest result.
• Financial instruments designated as the hedging transaction within a cash flow hedge to hedge against variable interest flows will only be recognised in the interest result when the payment flows have actually been initiated. However, the measurement of the hedging transaction at fair value is recognised in reserves retained from earnings outside of profit or loss.
• Interest rate derivatives that are not part of a qualified hedging relationship under IAS 39 are recognised at fair value in profit or loss in other financial result and, through resulting interest flows, in the interest result.

As of the closing date, METRO’s remaining interest rate risk is primarily the result of variable interest rate receivables and liabilities to banks as well as other short-term liquid financial assets (reported under cash and cash equivalents) with an aggregate debit balance after consideration of hedging transactions of €766 million (30/9/2021: €1,377 million).

Given this total balance, an interest rate rise of 10 basis points would result in a €1 million (2020/21: €1 million) higher interest result per year. An interest rate decrease of 10 basis points would have the opposite effect of €−1 million (2020/21: €−1 million).

METRO faces currency risks in its international procurement of merchandise and because of costs, financing, dividends and lease agreements that are incurred in a currency other than the relevant local currency or are pegged to the development of another currency. In accordance with the specifications of the group guideline ‘Foreign Currency Transactions’, resulting foreign currency positions must be hedged. Exceptions from this hedging requirement exist where hedging is not economically reasonable and in the case of legal and regulatory restrictions in the respective countries. METRO AG handles the group-wide coordination of the hedging measures of the group companies and uses external derivative financial instruments as needed. Moreover, currency risks for METRO result from the recognition of foreign currency lease liabilities and foreign currency lease receivables, which affect the amount of the other financial result due to the exchange rate at closing date. Where possible, the risk is reduced through the use of balance sheet hedging measures (‘natural hedge’).

In line with IFRS 7, the presentation of the currency risk resulting from the exceptions is also based on a sensitivity analysis. In the process, the following assumptions are made in the consideration of a depreciation or appreciation of the euro vis-à-vis foreign currencies:

In terms of its amount and result characteristic, the total effect presented by the sensitivity analysis relates to the amounts of foreign currency held within the consolidated subsidiaries of METRO and states the effect of a depreciation of the euro.

A depreciation of the euro will result in a positive effect if a receivable in the foreign currency exists at a subsidiary which uses the euro as its functional currency and if a liability in euros exists at a subsidiary which does not use the euro as its functional currency. The following table shows the nominal volumes of currency pairs in this category with a positive sign.

A depreciation of the euro will result in a negative effect if a receivable in euros exists at a subsidiary which does not use the euro as its functional currency and if a liability in the foreign currency exists at a subsidiary which uses the euro as its functional currency. Correspondingly, the following table shows the nominal volumes of currency pairs in this category with a negative sign.

By contrast, an appreciation of the euro will have the opposite effect for all currency pairs shown below.

In the sensitivity analysis, the effects of the measurement of non-equity foreign currency positions that are calculated based on the exchange rate at closing date in line with IAS 21 are recognised in the income statement. In the case of net investments in a foreign operation, the effects of the closing date measurement are recognised in equity (other comprehensive income) outside of profit or loss.

Forward currency contracts/options and interest rate and currency swaps that are not part of a qualified hedging relationship under IAS 39 are recognised through the fair value measurement in the income statement. In fully effective hedging transactions, this effect is offset by the effect from the measurement of the underlying foreign currency transaction.

In the consolidated financial statements, foreign currency future transactions are designated as hedging transactions within a cash flow hedge to hedge merchandise procurement and sales. Changes in the fair value of these hedging instruments are recognised in other comprehensive income until the underlying transaction is recognised through profit or loss.

Effects from the currency translation of financial statements whose functional currency is not the reporting currency of METRO do not affect cash flows in local currency and are therefore not part of the sensitivity analysis.

As of the closing date, the remaining currency risk of METRO, which is essentially due to an inability to hedge certain currencies for legal reasons or due to insufficient market depth, was as follows:

The foreign currency holdings above include intra-group balances. Foreign currency valuations from such holdings, insofar as no hedging is undertaken, lead to results in the other financial result as well as to compensating effects outside of profit or loss from the translation of the local financial statements of the counterparty into the group currency, which are recognised in other comprehensive income. This configuration mainly comes into play for cash and cash equivalents from Russia, which were made available to the group as liquidity. Currency risks existing in addition to these are mainly the result of USD currency holdings in various subsidiaries in which the functional currency is not the US dollar or the euro. At a nominal US dollar volume of €14 million (30/9/2021: €12 million), a depreciation of the US dollar by 10% would result in positive effects of €1 million in profit or loss for the period (30/9/2021: €1 million), while an appreciation would lead to negative effects of €1 million (30/9/2021: €1 million).

At a nominal volume of €8 million (30/9/2021: €7 million), the currency pair USD/IDR accounts for the main share of this effect.

Interest rate and currency risks are substantially reduced and limited by the internal treasury guidelines, if hedging with derivative financial instruments is possible. The group-wide regulations specify that all hedging operations must adhere to predefined limits and must not lead to increased risk exposure under any circumstances. METRO is aware that this severely limits the opportunities to exploit current or expected interest rate and exchange rate movements to optimise results.

In addition, hedging may be carried out only with standard derivative financial instruments whose correct mathematical measurement and accounting mapping are guaranteed.

As of the closing date, the following derivative financial instruments were being used for risk reduction:

The nominal volume of forward currency contracts/options and interest limitation agreements results from the net position of the buying and selling values in foreign currency underlying the individual transactions translated at the relevant exchange rate on the closing date. The nominal volume of interest rate swaps or interest rate/currency swaps and interest rate hedging agreements is shown on a gross basis. Compared to the previous year, the hedged nominal volume of the Russian rouble decreased. This decline is attributable to sanction-related disruptions of the RUB foreign exchange market.

All fair values represent the theoretical value of these instruments upon dissolution of the transaction as of the closing date. Under the premise that instruments are held until the end of their term, these are unrealised gains and losses that, by the end of the term, will be fully set off by gains and losses from the underlying transactions in the case of fully effective hedging transactions.

In order to appropriately show this reconciliation for the period, relationships are created between hedging transactions and underlying transactions and recognised as follows:

• Within a fair value hedge, both the hedging transaction and the hedged risk of the underlying transaction are recognised at their fair value. The fluctuations in the fair value of both transactions are shown in the income statement, where they will be fully set off against each other in the case of full effectiveness.
• Within a cash flow hedge, the hedging transactions are also principally recognised at their fair value. In the case of full effectiveness of the hedging transaction, the value changes will be recognised in equity until the hedged payment flows or expected transactions impact the earnings. Only then will they be recognised in the income statement.
• Derivative financial instruments which, according to IAS 39, are not part of a hedge are recognised at their fair value. Value changes are recognised directly in the income statement. Even if no formal hedging relationship was created, these are hedging transactions that are closely connected to the underlying transaction and whose impact on earnings will be netted by the underlying transaction.

Only derivatives in the form of forward exchange transactions are used as hedging instruments in hedge accounting (cash flow hedging) to hedge off-balance sheet currency risks. Generally, one underlying transaction is hedged in each case by means of a forward currency contract. The effectiveness of these hedges is assessed on the basis of the hypothetical derivative method. The ineffectiveness determined using this method results from the difference between the changes in value of the hedged item and the changes in value of the hedging transaction.

Currency derivatives are used primarily for British pound sterling, Chinese renminbi, Hong Kong dollar, Polish zloty, Romanian leu, Russian rouble, Czech koruna, Turkish lira, Hungarian forint and US dollar. The average hedging rates for METRO for the 2 particularly important currency pairs resulting from such hedges are as follows: 1.08 USD/EUR and 7.16 CNY/EUR. The maturity of derivatives used for hedging purposes in the amount of €11 million (30/9/2021: €8 million) is less than 1 year.

Liquidity risks

Liquidity risk describes the risk of being unable to procure or provide funding or being able to only procure or provide funding at a higher cost. Liquidity risks may arise, for example, as a result of temporary capital market disruptions, creditor defaults, insufficient credit facilities or the absence of budgeted incoming payments. METRO AG acts as financial coordinator for the group companies to ensure that they are provided with the necessary financing to fund their operating and investing activities as cost-effectively and sufficiently high as possible. The necessary information is provided by means of a group financial plan, which is updated monthly and checked monthly for deviations. This financial planning is additionally supplemented by a weekly rolling 14-day liquidity planning.

Financing instruments include money and capital market products (time deposits, call money, promissory note loans, commercial papers and listed bonds sold as part of ongoing capital market programmes) as well as bilateral and syndicated loans. METRO has a sufficient liquidity reserve so that liquidity risks are not likely, even if an unexpected event has a negative financial impact on the company’s liquidity situation. The credit facilities held as a liquidity reserve are subject to specific credit conditions. In the event that, contrary to expectations, the agreed credit terms cannot be met in the future and no temporary adjustment of the credit terms can be negotiated with the bank consortium, METRO has sufficient refinancing alternatives available with a similar liquidity effect. For more information about the instruments used for financing purposes, see the explanatory notes to the respective balance sheet items.

• For more information, see no. 29 – cash and cash equivalents as well as no. 36 – financial liabilities (excluding liabilities from leases).

Through intra-group cash pooling, financial resources can be allocated as needed by group companies with a financing need using the liquidity surpluses of other group companies. This reduces the group’s amount of debt and thus its interest expenses. In addition, METRO AG draws on the financial expertise pooled in the treasury of METRO AG to advise the group companies in all relevant financial matters. This ranges from the elaboration of investment financing concepts to supporting the responsible financial officers of the individual group companies in their discussions with local banks and financial service providers. This ensures, on the one hand, that the financial resources of METRO are optimally employed, and, on the other, that all group companies benefit from the strength and credit standing of METRO in negotiating their financing terms.

Credit risks

Credit risks arise from the total or partial default by a counterparty, for example through bankruptcy, or in connection with financial investments and derivative financial instruments with positive market values. METRO’s maximum credit risk as of the closing date is reflected by the carrying amount of financial assets totalling €2,202 million (30/9/2021: €2,711 million).

• For more information about the amount of the respective carrying amounts, see no. 40 – carrying amounts and fair values according to measurement categories.

Cash on hand considered in cash and cash equivalents totalling €13 million (30/9/2021: €18 million) is not exposed to any credit risk.

In the course of the risk management of financial investments totalling €770 million (30/9/2021: €1,417 million) and derivative financial instruments with positive market values totalling €15 million (30/9/2021: €23 million), minimum creditworthiness requirements and individual maximum exposure limits for the engagement have been defined for all business partners of METRO. Cheques and money in circulation are not considered in the determination of credit risks. This is based on a system of limits laid down in the treasury guidelines, which are based mainly on the ratings of international rating agencies, developments of credit default swaps or internal credit assessments. An individual limit is allocated to every counterparty of METRO; compliance is constantly monitored by the treasury systems.

The following table shows a breakdown of business partners by rating class:

The table shows that, as of the closing date, about 93.0% of the capital investment volume, including the positive market value of derivatives, had been placed with investment grade counterparties, in other words, those with good or very good credit ratings. Most of the counterparties that do not have an internationally accepted rating are respected financial institutions that have been subjected to a creditworthiness analysis. METRO also operates in countries where local financial institutions do not have investment grade ratings due to the rating of their country. For country-specific reasons as well as cost and efficiency considerations, cooperation with these institutions is unavoidable. These institutions account for about 3.0% of the total volume.

Overall, METRO’s level of exposure to credit risks is very low.

Cash flow risks

A future change in interest rates may cause cash flow from variable interest rate asset and liability items to fluctuate. Stress tests are used to determine the potential impact interest rate changes may have on cash flow and how they can be capped through hedging transactions in accordance with the group’s internal treasury guidelines.